EIP Editing Office Hour #104 (EIP + ERC)

Transcript

[music] Heat. Heat. >> [music] >> Recording in progress.

>> Welcome to EIP editing office hour meeting number 104. Today is June 30th and this agenda is added on Ethereum/PM GitHub repository with issue number 2143. We are joined by editor Sam Wilson. On agenda we have a bunch of open PRs uh from ACD meeting some related to meta EIP and other PRs to move from one status to another. We are joined by a few authors on the call as well and today we will get started with the proposal that is moving into the last call. Um the PR number is 1842 on ERC repository. [music] Thank you Sam for

joining us here. >> My pleasure. All right, let's get started. So uh going to last call 14 days out. That's good. Uh So, you're removing 804 here, but it

looks like you're still referencing it. Is [music] that intentional or? >> Yes. Um, can I just look at that, Sam? Can I just come back to you? >> Yeah, of course. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yes. And with that last one, um, even

though 804 is no longer a dependency, it's still looked at via 8126. Uh and the reason for that is um 804 is a dependency of 8126. So it's still the >> Okay, good. >> And that looks fine to me. No, actually I need to check your descriptions, too. Yeah, nothing new here. Perfect.

Cool. Nice and easy. >> Excellent. Thank you, son. Thank you, Pujo. >> No problem. >> Thank you. >> Take care. >> So, next we have 1495. This is a proposal for Meta on the upcoming upgrade. Yeah. So, uh do you want me to say some motivating words or >> uh if you have any specific questions uh go for it otherwise I'll just review it. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, no no specific questions from my side. I just uh I mean it's the first one I've written so I don't know how exactly the process goes. So the yeah I asked for feedback on ethium magicians. Um there were no was no major one but yeah I would be interested in

your feedback I guess. >> Sure. Yeah. So I'm um going to assume you're very new to the process. So this review is only for like adherence to the document structure and um like editorial stuff. I'm not going to be giving a review um [music] on the content itself. Uh for that you'll want to present this at the allcore devs call. Um yeah so uh I I'll go through this for uh formatting and adherence to our structure and everything and then yeah um let me just get into that. So check out codes heads up the rever or division by zero. Okay, interesting.

Um, save ad, save sub, save div that perform inside 256 built in. Okay. Okay. Um so I guess uh you know first question um this is content related. Um why do two questions? You know what I'll just ask these on your your thing because I'm sure if I'm asking them other people will be asking them. Um

let's see. So, um, actually, you might actually cover that in your rational section. Let's see. Uh, yep. Save it. Revert. Okay. So, yeah, you don't cover that one. So why refer to go for assert and then

think there's even a proposal for that. Yeah. >> Yeah, this one I address in the in the text.

>> Easy. Just that so far. Okay. So we had one, two, three, Four.

Yeah. Thanks. That's a good point. Okay. So you do cover it here. So

>> yeah, I wasn't sure if this would be sufficient. Yeah, this is great. Um, >> yeah, that's great for a first EIP.

Thanks for contributing that. >> Yeah, thanks a lot for your feedback. Uh, so I'll um I'll uh kind of update the merge request and then do I need to ping someone or >> uh it should just merge on its own. >> Okay. >> In a few minutes here. Okay, cool. Cool. Okay, cool. Thanks a [music] lot. >> Oh, no problem. >> Take it. >> All right. So, we can move with uh the other items. What I have done is like there are the two items on on agenda from ACD agenda are from the previous meeting and the rest which are other meta e related were newly added. [music] So, we can Okay, >> sounds good.

can state request. strand at the What is the

So, is this bad enough to block merging? Let's go and make some minor changes and then we can approve it. >> All right. >> Here at that All right.

Get to move on to this one here. Unfair allocation of >> Yeah. And I understand like these new peers, new EIPs are generally longer for office hour review. Yeah. So this one's blocked on um Yam's uh approval here. So um >> yeah, we can move on to the next [music]

one. >> Yeah, I will add it in Yam's opener office hour. >> Okay, I think we did this one already. >> Yes, we did it. >> Y Yes, the one I [music] just did. Dating on the same committee to publish

a single pre-ac individual ones attestation to the source multip validator scheduled in the same slot committee to publish. Yep. You send the existing antization to costs topic [music] if he has to say you're batch then batch seal. I got a bunch of I got to catch up on this morning [snorts] cuz like my work starts usually on Sunday nights basically. I'm kind of belly hookie. So it's kind of like two days.

>> I'm sorry about that. Uh, I'm not sure if that was related to the EIP conversation. Chris, if you are representing this PR, please drop a note in the chat and I will unmute you. Moving on. So I think that was that one.

So let's take a look at this one. >> So some of these are not part of the agenda but because uh you know authors are trying to propose it to the ACD meeting >> might as well get them in. Start the root hashes of index tables of system contract to allow efficient trans of log transaction. Okay. So the RA hashes a fixed [music] binary tree structures called index tables in the storage of a system contract as part of block rest generated for each block merge into [gasps] All

right. Give me one second. I'll be right back. And then we can do one more. All right. Uh, so that was 11811.

So 11812. All right. Good description price in the floor cost from 64 to 640 to 9696 gas per density of a pure colored block down to the bite density of a okay. Uh

pure call. Am I having a pure call data block? Why have a pure coat block with density greater than an ether transfer block is bad there 7860 16.

Did I read that right? 60. Neat. Any transaction with the gas blow? Uh about intrinsic gas cost is considered valid. The location All right, [clears throat]

cool. And we probably have time for another one. Awesome. 11821. Come on. Okay. Maybe not this one.

see moving to withdrawn. That should be quick. Oh, and you have to be in a different place. Um, so where does that need to be?

Draw reason needs to be after created. right. Um and approve

to withdraw. Okay. See some stuff. Neat.

I think Alex here is working on cleaning up of like some of the older proposals. And uh I guess the next PR is about a question like should it be moved forward or withdrawn or stagnant. So this is a good effort in order to clean the repository. Okay. Yeah. Good.

right, Cool. Well, that's it for me. Thanks everybody for coming out and uh we'll see you on the next office hours. Take care. >> Thank you everyone. Thank you Sam. See you in next office hour next Tuesday at 1600 UTC. Take care. >> What's up?

>> Heat. Heat. [music] Heat up [music] here.

Heat. [music] Heat.