Bitcoin Just Rejected Its Purists

Transcript

Ryan, when's the last time you thought about Bitcoin ordinals? Oh my god, it's probably been a good 12- 18 months. Well, you know how the Bitcoin community just they started to have a sort of like actual civil war about it. And you know when you say Bitcoin civil war it's stokes fears memories of the block size wars where Bitcoin actually split into Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin that actually happened. >> We had a fork of Bitcoin yourself. >> We had Bitcoin had a fork. A very like a very few instances in Bitcoin's past has it actually had a fork. This is probably the most impotent one I think of all of Bitcoin's forks. But it's still notable

nonetheless. >> A January 6 insurrection, like not a real insurrection. >> Yes. Yes. That is what even less than that though, I would say. >> Well, yeah. >> Yeah. We're going to talk about the fork in Bitcoin land uh and why Nick Carter is calling this the death of Bitcoin maximalism. What else we got on the news? >> Also, Sailor, he sold some more Bitcoin. Is he two weeks in a row? >> I know. He keeps selling. Uh, also Robin Hood chain, it's the number one Ethereum L2 by revenue. Took it in the took the crown in the first month. We'll talk about that. Um, 38% of all L2 revenue.

And David, I want you to fill me in on this. Fidelity is filing to stake up to 100% of its ETH ETF, and it wants to pay holders a dividend. Also, I'd love for you to give me an update on what's happening with the EIP we talked about last night with the ETH issuance cap and whether that's tied into this story, too. >> Yeah, hopefully hopefully the answer to that question is no, it's not tied into the story, but we we'll cover it when we get there. First, before we get into the markets, we got some hot mockate markets to talk about. We're going to talk to some of our friends and sponsors over at Near and Near.com. Near.com is kind of like where Near is dog food dog fooding a lot of their like products. X is like a firstparty product that uses a lot of

the near infrastructure. Uh it just launched on near.com is confidential yield uh with some with vault technology powered by near intent. So you can confidentially deposit into a vault and get yield confidentially through near.com. You can do it you can do it elsewhere in near because it's all powered by near intense. It's kind of like weaving together everything crossrain but they're integrating confidential intents plus vaults uh brought by Taylor Finance. So you can get yield confidentially. I'm saying the word confidentially a lot because like I'm trying to like >> uh what's the word? Manifest privacy in the rest of the crypto ecosystem. Like in the world of like memecoins and sailor posting AI hype videos like I'm

trying to manifest some substance here and like comes in in the form of privacy. And so uh pretty cool that near.com has this uh built for anyone. I don't know if you ever used your.com Ryan, but it's actually like they're integrating like all their first-party features one by one by one. It's is coming like becoming one of the most powerful wallet frontends because they keep on integrating all the features of crypto via near intense but confidentially. It's kind of cool. >> Yeah, I keep saying this. One of the shippest teams in crypto and they uh they keep shipping. Uh David, let's start markets off with the CPI numbers. So, consumer price index just came in at 3.4%. People were wondering whether we would be hot on inflation. Uh it wasn't hot. It was about at analyst

expectations. So just up 0.1% versus last month, June. This must be because oil prices are down a little bit. Did not factor into that. But CPI pretty much flat and right along expectations. I think the S&P and the NASDAQ were like up slightly on that news and certainly not down. But uh let's talk take a look at maybe the prices around the markets. What what about Bitcoin? What's the reaction on the week to Bitcoin? >> Yeah, the notable thing about Bitcoin, it's been pretty flat and it's continued to be flat. The notable thing about Bitcoin is that it fell below the 200E moving average and we were just marginally above the 200E moving average. We were hovering around like 64

to 65,000 and we fell about 2 and a half% on the week down to 63,300. The 200 week moving average Ryan is at $64,000 and so we are right below it even though it's like kind of the same price it's always been at, but the the 200WE moving average has been creeping upwards. when we had that low, that capitulation dump where Bitcoin went from 75,000 all the way down to 59,000. At that time, the moving average, the 200E moving average was $61.5,000. Now it's $63,000. So, it's creeping upwards and we're kind of riding it.

We're riding the 200E moving average up. And what's notable on top of that is Sailor dumped another clip of Bitcoin into the support into Bitcoin support. And so despite Sailor, the Michael Sailor selling at the 200E moving average, Bitcoin is kind of holding holding the 200 week. So it's a little bit notable that the biggest buyer is selling selling into the 200WE moving average and we're seemingly like not dead. So >> that's my that's my analysis of the week. >> Still under it. I guess like isn't just the algorithm you just buy Bitcoin under the 200WE moving average and like you're doing okay. I mean it hasn't >> we are fingernail under the 200E moving average. So I don't know if you're like

a deep value buyer. This is not what you are looking at. You're looking at you're trying to get like 5 to 10% plus below the 200WE moving average and we have only been under that like very briefly this cycle and not not very deep. So deep value may want to wait for that but fair value I mean under the 200 we have been in fair value. Uh yeah, >> the the other uh price chart to look at I think that's been interesting and somewhat surprising I think for a lot of people that came out of nowhere is gold is back up. So gold has been up 14% since July 17th, David. So gold futures now at uh you 4,500. They cleared that for the first time since June 5th. Gold

of course earlier this year had been a massive story. I think what we peaked in like January, February, remember silver went on its tear. >> Yeah. End of January it peaked at 55,000 to 56,000. >> Did we go to 56,000 an ounce? >> 56 the the pico the pico top. Yeah. The pico top. >> Okay. We were there briefly, but we did Wow. Yeah. Seen the charge. We did hit that and we went as low as what? 3,800 an ounce. Something like this. >> Yeah. Just below $4,000 an ounce. And like notably they started but gold started the January 2024 at $2,000 an ounce. It started January 2025 at $2,600 an ounce.

>> And then it just, you know, crescendoed for 14 months from 2,800 all the way up to 5,600. And this is gold. This is gold. This is number one asset in the world. >> Yeah. Like a a 20 trillion asset that became like a 30 trillion plus dollar asset. absolutely monster move in in 2025. So the question is, is it back? I mean, we're up 14 15% right now. Is this the debasement trade? There are a few answers to that that I've seen that are good. I think the best answer probably comes from Michael Howell's work. He follows Global Liquidity, as you know, we we talk about him often. He's been on the Bankless podcast before. Uh, and he just points to the POC, People's Bank of China. They are back in the market

injecting liquidity. They have their own debasement thing going on with the one and the proceeds from that liquidity, the liquidity that the PBOC injects, Michael Howell argues that goes into the price of gold. They went on pause in terms of injecting liquidity in the market sometime February, Marchish, and you also saw gold uh price start to go down because you lost that large marginal buyer. He's unclear on why they went on pause for so long. Maybe it's something to do with Iran war oil demand. They just didn't want to put too much liquidity in the market, but it seems like the PBC is back with their

own debasement trade. And so he forecasts gold could have bottomed and uh we could continue to rise from here with the PBC throwing off global liquidity. I think that's probably the best story I've heard around this. Is this a POC like minting money to buy gold or minting money to inject liquidity and then you know three, four or five dominoes happen and then there's a bunch of gold buyers at the end of that? I think it's kind of both. It's a little bit of both. Um, Bank of China, China is purchasing gold and also liquidity kind of slloshes around and finds its way into gold prim primarily in China market. Michael Howell argues this is because like crypto is bound banned. Bitcoin is is banned. There's a lot of capital controls. Property has

burnt so many you know Chinese citizens over the years. They had been investing Chinese real estate. That's no longer an asset class. So their store of value asset really is gold and that's why gold number go up when uh China debasement starts to happen. So >> you think this is taking some oxygen out of Bitcoin? No, I think it's um actually All right. So, like I don't think so. I think what's happening is it's actually giving some dry tinder for Bitcoin later. This is a really interesting chart from Michael NATO.

>> Sounds like >> No, like I mean look at this. You you tell me if this is compelling. So, this is a Bitcoin gold ratio and you could see this is again the cycles. You know, I don't know why anyone in crypto disbelieves the cycles these days because it's in every chart I've ever seen. Here's another chart of the cycles. >> So you see the Bitcoin gold ratio in the 2018 bare market, we had an 82% decline. In the 2022 bare market, a 75% decline. You look at this chart, we it seems like we may have bottomed at on the Bitcoin versus ratio versus gold, right? So Bitcoin versus gold at about a 69% decline. Okay. And we're off the bottoms. Yeah, it is nice. We're off the

bottoms right now and um you know this means if gold price go up and Bitcoin can follow it and possibly will follow it of course if this ratio has bottomed. So um I think maybe it's cope but >> look Bitcoin is a scarce asset. Gold is a scarce asset. They're both store value assets. The reason gold is getting a a pump right now is because it's PBOC liquidity. If we start to get Fed liquidity on the on the US side, the rest of the world side, Michael Howell again argues that that's what really props up and pumps the price of crypto assets, including Bitcoin.

>> Buying Bitcoin right now feels a little bit early in the sense that we still have like the doldrums of boredom to get through, like the flat part of the bare market to get through. But like I think it's one of those things where like you'll look back on it and you'll be very very rewarded at these very very good prices and you're going to be glad that you bought. You just have to kind of work through a bunch of bullish things happening that you would think are catalyst for Bitcoin and then they don't show up in the Bitcoin price and you're going to get frustrated because you're buying it early. Uh but ultimately it's all going to play out.

>> But this is how it works. It's like why would you why would you buy why would you buy Bitcoin when Bitcoin is exciting? That's like the exact wrong time to buy Bitcoin. The time to buy is when it's back to boring mode again. And we're definitely >> does feel quite boring. However, it's like everyone's just watching Michael Sailor's tweets about like how much Bitcoin he sold. >> Well, speaking of which, so you mentioned earlier Michael Sailor did sell some Bitcoin this week and he positioned himself for his reserve and SDRC preferred shares in a little bit of a healthier cash position. So, what happened on the week?

uh 1,691 bitcoin were sold over the last week increasing the USD reserve by 650 million. Uh so now in some strategy has 2.7 years of yield in dollars not bitcoin in dollar yield. This is the third week in a row that uh sailor has sold like a meaningful amount of bitcoin. Um, and I do think that this is kind of why we dipped under the 200WE moving average and we kind of like dipped this week even though we only dipped like a little bit, like I said, fingernails below the 200WE moving average. I think people are now kind of wondering, myself included. It's like, oh, okay. Third third week in a row.

Like, okay, all right. Like, how how many weeks in a row? You got to stop. >> Yeah, you're going to stop at some point, right? because when he s when he sold the 32 Bitcoin and Bitcoin fell by like 75,000 down to 65 $62,000, we were like, we're all in agreement that that was the market front running all of these sales by Sailor, but like did the market uh guess the total amount of Bitcoin to be sold by Sailor at these current levels correctly, or is Sailor going to surprise us by week after week clipping away another 1,700 Bitcoin week after week? It seems like it's not that much sell pressure to be able to be absorbed. And notably, Ryan, uh, both

the Bitcoin and the Ether ETFs are net buyers since June. >> So June and July and so far in August, the ETFs are net buyers. And so like, you know, you can kind of count it like Sailor was handing his Bitcoin to Black Rockck and people are buying it up over there. Uh, but like I I don't know. Like is he is he is he like just going to be selling Bitcoin for the rest of the year because that's going to be really hard as a narrative to like overcome. >> I mean it's really clear he wanted to get STRC back into a healthy territory. Now it's trading above 95. So it's as close.

>> Yeah. To 100. So that seems to have been a priority judging by what he did. you you kind of wonder at this point in the market I mean does have this great I guess great from from one perspective credit structure now in place with uh STRC but also like I mean he's taken his eye off the ball of just buying Bitcoin cheap with cash right it's like his average cost basis is something like 75k like he's under his average cost basis >> he's selling for a loss >> it's like would it have just been better I mean and he's starting to sell Bitcoin at a loss from his cost basis would it have just been better for him not to do the credit instrument and get tied up there so he could continue to accumulate at least not sell Bitcoin at these fair

value depressed prices. I don't know. I mean, time will tell. Uh we'll have to see what he does, but it's it clearly his priority has been on making sure that STRC is still a good credit vehicle for him moving forward. >> Are you in the camp that Sailor needs to sell Bitcoin and get out of the way so Bitcoin can appreciate? Um, no. I I think I think I'm I'm still in the camp of what we talked about last week, which is sort of he was a main character because we were worried about a um unorderly unwind from him. And now that that concern is on the back burner, he's kind of a back burner. And I don't think sailor is the main factor suppressing Bitcoin prices or doing

anything. What do you think? Um, I do kind of wonder like markets are very very intelligent and so I do kind of wonder that like it's sailor keeping the price down and he still has to kind of puke up a bunch of Bitcoin for it to like kind of like awaken reawaken burn from the ashes. >> Yeah. >> And like the the slow deflation is just him staying in the way for too long. Um, but then it's like, okay, can he play can he wait this thing out until something like fundamentally bullish comes in? Um, but like still to this day, I I am of the belief that like the sailor needs to it would just be easier and better for everyone if he just puked up a bunch of Bitcoin, but he's not

going to be doing that. >> Yeah, he's not puking out. It's not a violent vomiting. It's more like a kind of a a burp, you know, like a a steady burp of Bitcoin coming off the balance sheet. Maybe that's enough. At the same time, could the Ethereum ecosystem ask for a better >> buyer alter alternative to to Michael Sailor than Tom Lee? This guy has not sold any ETH and he has purchased every single week since like this time last year. Like even I get this notification like looks on Shane and my telegram saying, "Hey Tom Lee, here's a picture of Tom Lee. This man just bought $25 million of ETH. I get it every week.

>> That's what he did. He just bought another $25 million of ETH last week. Has not sold any. Does not have this credit instrument, of course. So, has a uh a cleaner, more simple balance sheet. And um man, it's just like a total blessing for Ethereum and ETH holders, I think. I mean, they got to be everyone's got to be very thankful. Where would ETH price be without Tom Lee right now? I don't have that. >> I do I do not want to know. >> I don't want to know. He He's at He was at 4.8% last time you checked in. I don't know how far 13,000 ETH 13,000 ETH hasn't really moved the dial on that.

>> Probably not. >> Yeah. 13,000. Yeah. So, I think he's still 4.8 plus now. Not quite at 5%. >> Well, so the question of course in the market section to conclude with is like um you know, Michael Nato says we're 85% of the way done. We've got two more months. That'll get us to 12 months. That's how long bare cycles last. We should see a bottom sometime in the next 2 months, David. So, that means we're almost done here. Okay. And the timebased capitulation story according to the cycles theory of everything. The question there if if you believe in that is will we see another low, a lower low for Bitcoin? Will we get to 55K? Will we get under that? Will we get into the low 50s? Will we get into the 40s? What do

you think? What's what's your take right now as as you look at the market and get the the sentiment and pulse of crypto? Um, previously I have stated that I have gotten more and more bullish because like Sailor is just not FTX. He's not through our capital. We don't have that same sort of like sins to pay for compared to last cycle when last cycle Bitcoin did meaningfully go below the 200WE moving average because of all that contagion that we had to deal with. And so this cycle doesn't look anything like that. Uh I'm less and less bullish these days. I'm moderately more bearish, trending more bearish, just a little bit. Um so like I think maybe two weeks ago I was saying I was like 60% plus we've already bottomed. And now I'm like 40% plus we've already bottomed. And my

analysis that is I'll make up on the spot this week is that I do think Sailor's getting out of the way of the market as I've said which is what's kind of needed. he is doing that yet. Nonetheless, like what if the market just bottoms and pukes anyways >> because of whatever reason? And again, not a not a huge amount, but just like sets a new low, calls it calls it good. People get very mean and frustrated about Bitcoin and they go buy the top of the AI stunks in October, which is when Ben Cowin, who knows more than me, is saying that we're going to bottom around October and then we're up only from there. And so I am I am keeping an open mind for that possibility. I have not

yet I I am not yet a buyer of of Bitcoin, but I do plan on backing up the truck if that if that does happen. If that does >> backing up the track truck. What? Selling what? Selling AI stocks for this. Would you dare? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> David plans to time it perfectly. You know, you get the top on AI stocks and you get the bottom in Bitcoin. >> I always intend on timing it perfectly. >> Perfect timing here. Uh let's talk next after the sponsor break about the Bitcoin fork. Speaking of perfect timing fork died in two blocks, what's going on here? Nick Carter called death ever.

Worst fork in history. Also, the Robin Hood chain. We'll discuss that. It's going very well. We'll see if that can be sustained. All this and more. But before we do, we want to thank the sponsors that made this possible. I've been trading crypto assets for almost a decade. And I've used so many wallets, exchanges, aggregators, front ends, and I'm kind of always looking for the same thing, one interface with deep liquidity across a bunch of chains and assets and the ability to act in private. And I still control my own funds. And I've never really found it. And I'm always switching wallets, juggling gas fees, or getting eaten by slippage. Near.com feels fundamentally different to me. My account is easy to use, and I can take all the actions I want from any chain while my activity remains confidential.

It runs on Near, which has moved over $23 billion crosschain using postquantum signing and has over 5 years of uptime. Near.com is the best way to be onchain and be in control. Get 20% of your trading fees back through the bankless link. It's in the show notes. Not investment advice. Self-custody won, but it still has a usability problem. A seed phrase on paper is still a single point of failure. Phones get lost, devices break, backups disappear. Bit key is a self-custodial hardware wallet built for that reality. It uses a two of three multisig with keys split across your phone, the bit key hardware device, and block. No single key can move your Bitcoin, and block can never move it alone. There's no seed phrase to lose or expose. And if you lose your phone, your Bit Key, or both, built-in recovery

gives you a path back. The hardware screen also lets you verify the destination before approving a transaction. And that's the point. More control without one mistake putting everything at risk. So download BitKey today and use promo code bankless to get 10% off of your BitKey. This episode has been sponsored by BitKeep. On Saturday, August 8th, at block 961,632, Bitcoin forked when a handful of Bitcoin nodes enforcing BIP 110, which is soft fork, rejected the Antpool block that mined the normal block because it didn't carry the required signal. So, Bitcoin forked into two forks. This had been planned for months. This is what BIP 110

was. And this was all of the anti-ordinal, anti-NFT, anti-R arbitrary data in Bitcoin camp created BIP 10. So, at this block, they were going to fork and all the Bitcoin purists, which is the get the data off of my backyard people were going to fork off into their own chain and have an even more constrained version of Bitcoin that had minimized all of the surface area to add arbitrary data to Bitcoin, which allowed for the ordinals. And the worry was this this is like a story of weird internet culture because like the Epstein files became a relevant variable in this whole thing.

>> Wait, what? >> Because >> because these hardcore Bitcoin purists including like some of the like hardcore religious types were like if you allow I can't believe this is real. If you allow for arbitrary data in Bitcoin, they might people might put like child pornography in the blockchain as a attack on Bitcoin to censor it. So anyone running a Bitcoin node would have to download the CP and that would make them like in violation of their laws probably wherever they >> and the government would shut it down and then also shut down as a a a runner of a Bitcoin node would also have some moral legal responsibility. And isn't that disgusting? You know, terrible.

>> And so we should, that's why we should only allow Bitcoin transfers essentially in the Bitcoin blockchain, not some sort of arbitrary data that had been opened up by by previous uh forks. >> And this whole side of the Bitcoin camp, to call it aside, is like doing it too much justice. There's not that many of these people, but this is like the Luke Dash Jr. camp. And Luke Dash Jr. is very he's a Bitcoin core dev uh been around for forever very religious and ironically has put plenty of like uh like Bible proverbs in the blockchain like he wrote that in there but >> Bible verses Bible verses but you know >> to each to each their own I guess uh anyways this day the day finally came

when all of these people which are these hardcore purist maximalist zealots like religious zealots type they decided to fork and so we all got to kind of see how consensus. This fork, this the anti-ordininals fork had uh it had Ryan 2.5% of hash power, which I'm actually impressed that they got that much. They had 2.53% of mining power from the fork. Uh the the goal was to have 55%. The problem when you only have 2.5% of hash power is that they didn't they forgot to change the difficulty adjustment because they thought that they were going to get more hash power I guess.

>> And so the difficulty for mining a Bitcoin block stayed where it was but they only had 2.5% amount of hash power. So the the typical block was supposed to be like or was going to be mined in some time in like the next year or something rather than the next 10 minutes. And so it killed it on delivery. Like it was a what's it called when a baby's dead on delivery. >> Oh my god. >> It's that it was that whatever that word is. >> Okay. >> Yeah. Jameson Loph said, "I won't be welcoming back or unblocking on Twitter any BIP 10 supporters. I expect that Bitcoin Puritan culture will continue on his path to becoming even more unhinged." Um anyways, that's your

update in drama Bitcoin Land. Okay, there's a a few other things I guess like so one I think that's interesting is like it's been a while since we've seen a fork and there's always the question of like who decides what is real Bitcoin and what is Bitcoin. This is the first time to your point that we've actually really tested this in some way since 2017 when some some big things happened in 2017 with the kind of the Bitcoin cash versus Bitcoin and individual node runners the exchanges came in on one side. So kind of like an overarching question to you is just like well who does decide what is Bitcoin? So in a sense the BIP uh 110

supporters they sort of forked themselves off right because they had nodes Bitcoin nodes most of them being nonmining nodes of course they're not necessarily miners they downloaded uh the BIP 110 version of Bitcoin and started running it right and there's a question of like once some users with nodes start to run this software, how many other users can they get to also run this software? And then >> does the economics flow as well? So there are other stakeholders. Do the exchanges decide to list whatever the ticker might be for this? Let's say it's

like BIP, BTC or something like that, right? Do exchanges decide to launch that? If exchanges launch it, what is the market price of this relative to Bitcoin? If there's enough market price and value, then miners may decide to get on board. And that's how you sort of start to get legitimacy enough consensus that this is a thing. We didn't even reach nearly that threshold. Like no exchanges listed close. >> Yeah. Didn't get close. Like miners um you know did not mine it. It was like a complete failure. Didn't even get to a threshold to test this. But it goes back to the question of like who who does decide what actual Bitcoin is? It's kind

of a squishy mix of users running their own nodes plus block producers, Bitcoin miners plus the social layer in the economy of like exchanges and ETF issuers and everybody else. But I think it's changed a little bit since 2017. Like I think those are all the parties involved. But there have been some parties that have gained more influence in these types of of decisions, I suppose, and others that have like waned in influence. At least it seems like that to me. I mean, Michael Sailor wasn't around in 2017 in in those forkware wars, for instance. Now he is.

It also seems like the Bitcoin maximalists, like the hardcore Bitcoiners, are more muted, more dormant. I mean, Nick Carter called this the the death of uh Bitcoin maxis. Uh he said their most hardcore foot soldiers defect to a doomed ultraorththodox faction never to return. Their most purist influencers exposed by shilling cold card. Cold card was the hack we talked about last week. That was like a Bitcoin only hardware um device and that was just like that did not work out for a whole bunch of the holders. um another purist uh merchant payment service hack.

So he he's listing a whole bunch of flesh wounds that that Bitcoin maximalists have taken this year. It's interesting. Back in 2017, I would have called Nick Carter a Bitcoin maximalist, right? So like >> Yeah. Uhhuh. >> The social landscape has completely changed and like you know I don't know what do you make of this? Who is deciding what Bitcoin actually is now in 2026 and has that changed? I think always the answer to this question about who decides what is Bitcoin is like the market which is in terms of just like efficiency and correctness. I feel like it hits some sort of like efficiency frontier and just like yeah you named a bunch of players in the Bitcoin space. You add

them all together you just get the market. the market decides like even if even if exchanges like you can take out any one part of like all the interlocking in set of incentives that composed together create Bitcoin but like if like you can take away the exchanges but and leave the rest that's you know the market is deciding you know you can take away the node operators but you leave the rest that's the market deciding and so to me the answer is always just like it's it's the broad nebulous idea of the market and ultimately it's it's really uh probably the price the price of Bitcoin is determinant of like what Bitcoin is. And this is why when Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin uh had their actual civil war, there was that one day that Bitcoin Cash

almost flipped Bitcoin. It came within like >> pretty close for that. Insane. >> Yeah, it almost flipp flipped Bitcoin. It came It came within like 15% of flipping Bitcoin. And like if that if it had flipped Bitcoin and then maintained it, >> it would like we would not we would just be calling that Bitcoin and then the other one would be like Bitcoin Classic or something. >> What a different universe that would be. I I guess my last question on this thread to you then is if Nick Carter is right in Bitcoin maximalism is dead and he's defining it in kind of like, you know, purist super orthodox there's only Bitcoin that level of of maximalism.

If that's dead, is that good for Bitcoin? Kind of think the Bitcoin maximalist side of Bitcoin has become increasingly irrelevant over the years. Like even Sailor is like not that maxi uh in the sense that like he he he talks positively of other chains. And so yeah, in the now in the broad sc scope of things like especially this hard fork with these like weird zealots who are completely unhinged like their logic and calculus being a part of the Bitcoin conversation is just not helpful and it's best that they're not around.

>> It's a different era though, isn't it? I mean the cyber hornets are are kind of dead. They're um their legacy. They're back in 2017, 2018, 2019. It's a different group now. And this was kind of the last vestage of of that group, I think. and they've just forked themselves off Bitcoin. So there you go. A Bitcoin fork that >> Well, I think I think they're actually they never >> Just kidding. Just kidding. >> Failure to launch. >> Uh tell me about the Robin Hood chain. >> Yeah. Back into Ethereum land. Uh okay. So Robin Hood chain is now the number one. It has been, but the the data of the last week has really cemented it.

Robin Hood chain is now the number one Ethereum L2 by blockchain revenue in its first full month of being live. has generated $3.6 million in July revenue. I think I was last week I projected it to come at at like $3.2 million in revenue, but this last week of time. Oh, we're in the second week of August. I don't know what's going on. Uh it has crescendoed in revenue uh because there's like a flurry of memecoin trading, but not just memecoin tradings. Some of the uh the metrics just looked really good. App layer protocol TVL on Robin Hood chain is just shy of $1 billion. sets across like Morpho, Uniswap, a few others. Uh there's over a $1 billion supply of stable coins on

Robin Hood hood chain. Uh DEX volume is tapering off but still pretty healthy. Uh and then stock token TVL, which is like the most important metric, which is still weak. It's nonetheless up a 3x. It's up from uh $10 million to $30 million. PIP squeak numbers, but it's tripled. Uh so $30 million is is it's still a good number. Uh and so it's also interesting to note that Bass is not number two, it's number three behind Polygon proof of stake. Uh other than Poly Market, what else is on Polygon putting in the transaction numbers?

>> I mean stable coins, you know, like uh Polygon um also Polyark. Yeah, you said Poly Market. But yeah, there's >> Polygon is surprisingly active. I think they've just like been um been continuing here. But yeah, that's that's a surprising amount of revenue from Robin Hood. I guess my question is do you think it can be sustained? Because when I look at what's happening on Robin Hood, there's an element where there's nothing really new here. Maybe it's a new user base. Definitely feels like new energy into crypto, which is great, but it's all of the DeFi protocols that we've already had. Memecoins as a use case is something we have elsewhere and we we that's a very much a known thing.

Tokenized stocks maybe that's kind of a breakout but like >> that's that's the new thing but that's why it's but that's why it's notable that it's so low. >> Maybe that's why it's so low because it's brand new. >> Well 30 million of the what the you said about 1 billion >> a billion dollars of protocol. >> So it's it's not like it's tokenized stock that's propelling this thing. So my question to you is like do you think this can be sustained? Actually >> you kind of you can look at the behavior of Vlad and this is what a lot of like the memecoin traders are looking at for a signal. Vlad on Twitter is really leaning into Robin Hood chain. They listed Cash Cat which I hate talking about this but like Cash Cat was the

memecoin on Robin Hood chain. They listed it on the Robin Hood app and so all of the memecoin people and traders are happy because they're like being >> supportive of Yeah, you are. They are supporting the memecoin trenchers dumping their bags on Robin Hood retail. They're supportive of that. Uh and but but nonetheless, uh I think for for some reason like the trenchers really look to the leadership and be like is the leadership like legitimizing our hobby, our passion, our our way of making money. And the answer is yes.

Like Vlad is doing that. But Ryan, I'm going to tell you a sentence. You're going to tell me what year it is. The sentence is an NFT mint was happening happened on Robin Hood chain. It sold out. 37,000 NFTts were purchased for $17 each. 5,000 more were sold for 117 for a total of $1.3 million. Uh about almost $700 in ETH uh was sold for NFTs on Robin Hood chain. What year is it? >> I mean that felt like 2021 except you said Robin Hood chain which was completely inac year. So yeah, but are NFTs really making a comeback or doing something on the Robin Hood chain? Is

that part of the the story here? >> I mean, a sold out NFT mint that made 1.2 $1.3 million is not from 2021 cuz it would be like hundreds of millions of dollars. >> I like that that number. Yeah, >> we had we had to we had to downpric these things appropriately. Uh but this was minted this this whole project is called Sprite Hood. So they're little sprites, little pixel arts. Uh I'm not sure if we know exactly. They're all kind of hidden. So these are not the NFTs that we're looking at. They're kind of the placeholders because they're going to get revealed in the future. >> Okay. >> Uh but uh Cole, who's the guy that that created Pudgy Penguins back in the day, uh he minted these. So this is Cole like season 2, like NFT project season 2. He he sold Pudgy Penguins to Luca. Everyone

knows Luca as the guy behind Pudgy Penguins. He sold it to Luca in like 2022 or 2023. >> Uh so yeah, we're doing we're doing NFT mints. You know, just surprised me is I didn't realize this was a link to OpenC. I'm on OpenC again. >> What year, dude? What year? >> It looks so different, but it also looks exact same. So, >> I mean, what's the probability that NFTTS make a comeback? You think in some form in crypto? >> Uh, teens teen percentage. I think it's pretty high. I think that at some point NFTs will make a comeback. I I don't know if that's like new NFTs coming to market or old NFTs coming back.

>> New NFTs and then some of the OG NFTs will kind of do well as a kind of in the afterglow of some new NFT mania of some sort. I mean, >> yeah, >> it could take a while still. This may not be it. I'm not saying this is it, but like the NFT use case, I think it's going to come back. Punks are currently 31 ETH floor which is basically been in where it's at in a while. So not yet not yet in the in the punk flat.

>> Yeah, data is not on my side in that argument. Uh we got more to discuss. Meme coins are on your radar, David. >> More more memecoin. We're going to talk about memecoins some more. >> Yeah, FOMO versus pump. I want you to tell me about this. Also, uh Fidelity's ETH dividend. What's that? And the clarity vote coming up. What's the probability that that passes? All this and more. But before we do, let's thank the sponsors that made this possible. Travel rewards have gotten way more complicated than they need to be. You've got points that expire, transfer partners, blackout dates, and somehow you still end up wondering if you actually got a good deal. Coinbase is taking a much simpler approach. When you book flights, hotels, rental cars, or vacation rentals through the Coinbase 1 travel portal using your Coinbase 1 card, you'll earn 5% in Bitcoin on

eligible travel bookings. Book a $400 flight, and you'll earn about $20 back in Bitcoin. No reward charts, no transfer partners, no redemption games, just Bitcoin that you can hold or trade. And every other purchase on your Coinbase One card can earn up to 4% back in Bitcoin. Plus, new card holders earn a $50 Bitcoin bonus after spending $100 in their first 30 days. So, if you've got travel coming up, check out the link in the show notes and see if you're approved today with no impact on your credit score. Or just visit coinbase.com/banklist. Terms apply. That's coinbase.com/banklist for more information.

>> Some exciting news. We are launching a new podcast to help people figure out the crypto cycle, how to navigate it. The best crypto cycle investor I know, his name is Michael Nato. He runs the DeFi Report. This is the guy that sent me a sell alert before the 1010 price drop happened. His cycle analysis has been absolutely on point. I've been following him for years and this year we started recording weekly podcast episodes. Each one we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether, and where we are in the cycle. There's new episodes that are released every Wednesday.

They're 30 minutes. They're short. They're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most. So, let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast. Search the DeFi Report wherever you get your podcast. YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or find a link in the show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now. Ryan, are you familiar with FOMO? I've heard of it, not used it. Basically, a breakout. I don't if it's a breakout into mainstream, but it has certainly broken out to basically everyone who's going to trade new tokens, new meme coins on on crypto. Um, it's a really friendly wallet. It's a lot of XDYDX and XU Uniswap people uh to came out and build a FOMO. It feels like the phantom of

this cycle uh where they just had to like break out adoption. uh really good onboarding experience and so you can get money into the app pretty easily and that's >> very much mobile first, right? Mobile first. >> Mobile. Yeah, there there is a desktop but it's very very mobile first. Uh and they've just had a gargantuan rise in users. So they've had 40,000 new signups in one month and one user is direct revenue. Like it's not like a two-stage thing. I mean, I guess it is where you can download the app and just like look at it, but people tend to convert into putting money into the app and then trading, which is where FOMO gets their revenue from. They get money on the swaps. Uh, and so four 30 40,000 new active traders in the last month making about 400,000 or 500,000 trades. Um,

>> but what are they trading? So, I'm looking at the I'm looking at the app here and I see a bunch of meme coins on the left. Is it primarily a memecoin trading? It's >> primarily coins. You can do you can buy like everything. You can buy Bitcoin, you can buy ETH, you can do pers, but it's primarily meme coins. There's a bunch of social features built into it as well. Uh, and so like you can follow your friends, you can see what tokens they're buying, you can see how down bad they are. Uh, and so it's it's leaning leading very heavily into like social trading features. And you you could say the the negative take or the the not not negative but just like they're wrapping up Pump Fund into an app and they are the consumer front end for Pump Fun because so much of their revenue is

pump tokens or other meme coins and doesn't matter uh what chain they're on like you can do them on on uh FOMO but there has been a growing crescendo of tension between FOMO and Pump because Pump Pump has its own app because it wants to verticalize, right? So like Pump first off started off as just the bonding curve token launchpad, right? And then they verticalized into Pump Swap and they kicked out Radium >> so that they could internalize their own fees from their AMM. So they built their own AMM so they would stop giving all their their fees to Radium. And so they verticalized into that and then they vert verticalized into the pump app, but FOMO is competing with them at the app level. And because owning the user,

owning the consumer is so lucrative that that's really where you want to be. And so FOMO revenue is like through the roof, but it's coming out of Pump's pocket because they're not owning those users. So now there is a fight for user acquisition between the pump app and FOMO app and they're at each other's teeth on Twitter talking about which app is the more userfriendly like app like which takes less fees and which gives more you know tokens back to their users and that's the current like drama on like crypto Twitter right now is >> why can't they work together like so so does Pump and FOMO they both take a a cut of I don't know trading fees for >> they do that's right that's right Yeah,

like it it strikes me that like FOMO is sort of a front end and pump that that seems like that could be very collaborative, right? It's like MetaMask and unis swap or like you know Phantom and even Pump or >> I think Pump just wants to own the whole entire vertical. You are right in that like more FOMO users will end up being like good for Pump Protocol but not the pump app and the pump team is probably like well we can make the most amount of money if we and own the endto-end user relationship. The durability of memecoins has been surprising to me even because we are in a bare market and still like pump is throwing off a lot of revenue. FOMO, you said 40,000 like new traders in the month. This is all

memecoin stuff. Even Robin Hood, the life is in memecoin stuff. Memecoins have been very persistent. I mean, there's the argument that they would just go the way of NFTts. They were like a previous cycle thing, but they have uh stayed around even this bare cycle, which makes me think they might have a role to play in the next bull cycle. I don't think they're going away, David. >> Yeah, that's a good point. I don't don't quite get it because we structurally know that meme coins take money, people's money away. Structurally, that's what they do. A few people win, a lot of people lose. Where where does all of this money keep on coming from to like finance all these like memecoin activities? And so like the the the level of extraction that meme coins

represent yet the level of durability that they do have. >> I don't know that question. >> Yeah, it's been surprising. People like memecoins, I guess, just like going to the casino. Uh David, the Clarity Act not looking too good. I think it's down below 20% probability on Polyark. I saw 15% at some point this week. I think at the time of recording it's about 18% probability that the Clarity Act happens um this year. What what is the kind of the next step? Like what has to happen next for Clarity to actually have a shot at going to effect this year? Well, we're we're getting a vote on it in September. So, we still see a vote

probably. I think um the Congress is going to go on recess and then we're going to get a vote. But despite like getting a vote or at least being told that we're going to get a vote, people are still bearish on it. Uh because a delaying benefits both the Democrats and the banks. Democrats just want to delay till post midterms. And this is just like maybe they're just saying, "Yeah, we're going to delay it till September and then September comes." Like, "Yeah, we're going to delay it post midterms and then midterms midterms come." Uh and then even if the vote were to go, there's no guarantee that it would pass. Uh, and so yeah, it's just the doors seem to be.

>> You know what's kind of funny here though is there's a silver lining in that we may still get a lot of these provisions in the interim with the Paul Atkins SEC. I I saw more headlines like this from the block SEC could propose pivotal crypto rules that may start with a token safe harbor. This is from TD uh Cowan. So this is like Paul Atkins doing parts of the Clarity Act by regulator and that's good. And then also remember the clarity act for the compromise of the banks. We were going to lose our our le our our stable coin yield loophole.

So if clarity doesn't pass with that loophole closed the bank like we're still getting the yield on our stable coins. >> I mean that's kind of a silver lining isn't it? The the the banks don't get to take that from us. >> So >> I think so. >> Yeah. >> There's that. I guess even if this doesn't pass. >> Yeah. I still want native stable coin yield. It feels right, but I guess I'm being picky. >> Yeah. >> Um it it is a big question of like how much can Paul and the Atkins and the SEC, how much can they do and how much will stick depending on the outcome of the 2028 election.

>> That's the big question of course. Uh David, Fidelity is adding staking and quarterly cash dis uh distributions to its ETH ETF. So, it's going to give staking yield to ETH ETF holders for the Fidelity ETF. Um, I think it's about a billion dollars in there right now in their Ethereum ETF. And they talked about potentially staking up to 100% of their ETH holdings. I guess they can do that from a risk perspective. That's interesting in and of itself. I guess I wanted to ask you, I haven't really checked in too much since uh we talked about it last week, but the whole EIP kurfuffle around capping staking

issuance, has that had any movement? I know you talked to some people on the kind of the the anti- side, you talked to Stani and others, and you're looking to talk to people on the on the kind of the pro side, but is that proposal like dead or is there still some life? What is the the more recent debate this week on on you know staking cap? >> It's not dead in the sense that people are still discussing it and the conversation is ongoing but it is dead in the sense that I think it's very very very unlikely and a lot of people don't want it to the point and so what we said last week is like you need a lot of consensus to change ETH monetary policy and we don't even have a little bit of

consensus on this. Uh so I record with Jerome and maybe one more person. Um I have been going around to ask who from the pro state uh ETH uh stake targeting side wants to come on and discuss >> not pro arguments and there a lot of the the the general answer is that if you are inside of the Ethereum Foundation SE part of the world including its recent spin-offs you don't want to expend your social capital on arguing the pro side because it's my interpretation is that it's a losing cause and so why bother expending social capital here. Um so that's not a good sign that it has that like longevity if people aren't willing

to like go up to bat and fight for it in public. But nonetheless, uh Jerome, who's not inside of the EF, uh who's been like one of the pioneers, the leaders, the pushers of this, uh EIP, he's gonna come on and maybe I'm gonna get one more. >> Sam Jernigan is you remember Sam Jernigan, like he's very pro this. And so maybe maybe it's him, maybe it's them too. >> Okay. So, and Jerome is not yet backing down from this. So, still publicly supportive of it. >> No, he's he's like Yeah. public he's he's the guy that like introduced it in the first place. >> Gotcha. Okay. Well, we'll we'll see where that goes, but I'm considering it dead. Uh, and ignoring a lot of the conversation around it because I just find it >> Yeah.

>> bare market conversation. It just gets me down. >> Yeah. Yeah. I do think it's interesting that there's going to be an ETH ETF with staked ETH that pays a cash dividend. And I'm going to enjoy the data that we get from this about like how many people like the Black Rockck version of the ST ETF versus the Fidelity version. and the black rocket just acrews in the value of the underlying whereas Fidelity pays you a cash dividend. So we get to run those two experiments even though like economically they're the same tax they're slightly different but economically the same and so we get to see like how much people really like the dividend.

>> I I agree and this is another thing just from a pure mimemetics conversation and just like a um I don't know me market fit for the asset. I think Wall Street and I think investors like the idea of issuance. They like the idea of yield on a bond and that that is a distinction versus Bitcoin. And I think it's a a useful distinction, right? Like I think this is part of the reason that Wall Street and investors like prefer ETH to the extent that they do prefer ETH to Bitcoin is because it has some yield. So from just from that perspective alone, I don't know why we

would unless there was like a really compelling ironclad reason that made a lot of sense. I don't know why we would cut that. It's like we want to become more like Bitcoin even though ETH issuance is lower already and people seem to like the idea of an internet bond with yield and are getting used to that. Feels like that would be a step backwards to me. But >> that was my conclusion with my episode with Stanie and Mike. Whereas like going in the opposite direction doesn't feel correct. Like let's not just arbitrarily increase issuance because we like yield of course but but let's not delete issuance either. There's probably a goldilock zone. It feels like it should be hard in the hard money zone end zone which feels like it's in the 1 to 3%

yield range which is where we're at. >> That's where we're at. And annualized issuance for ETH right now is just at the same or less than Bitcoin. It's like under, >> you know, uh8% per year. So, that's a good place to be. Certainly less than gold. David, let's end with this. Um onchain, the VVV is still doing quite well from a revenue generation perspective. Um what's 7 days straight confirmed of all-time highs in Venice revenue? Is that what I'm seeing?

>> That's right. Okay. So Venice revenue and VVV onchain burn are like one one ratio in terms of just like these are one to one correlated with each other. Uh and we have had seven days in a row of VVV burn hitting all-time highs and so the last seven days have been higher than you know yesterday was higher than the day before higher than the day before higher than the day before for seven days. I'm looking at right now we might not hit eight but today might be tied for a second. So August 10th is currently the number one and it burned $14,000 of VVV. We were looking to burn $13.7,000 of VBV. But it's notable that Venice has been crescendoing in VV VB burn. It's been since like July it's

been hovering around $10,000 $9,000 a day of VVB burn and that's been the equilibrium and seemingly we're breaking through that. So the new question is where does the new equilibrium lie? Um, it's just something I'm watching because like the VVV price has been going down after it has like kind of blew off top at $20, >> but you know, token price goes down, revenue revenue goes up. Like I know I know what happens when those two things happen. >> What should happen anyway? What should >> I know what ought to happen. >> All right, Bank Nation, that is it for this week. We will be back in a week.

Oh, yeah. We didn't really talk about it, but it's released a day early because of scheduling reasons. Should we say that at the beginning? Yeah, it's that's fine. People know now. >> All right. Well, if if you made it to the end, it's because of scheduling reasons. That's that's why you got this on Thursday. Anyways, crypto is risky. That is why we are here. However, the institutions have landed. So, we are going even further west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we are glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.